Continue to site >
Trending ETFs

Name

As of 06/01/2026

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

$56.15

$8 B

0.85%

$0.48

0.17%

Vitals

YTD Return

7.5%

1 yr return

25.1%

3 Yr Avg Return

20.6%

5 Yr Avg Return

12.0%

Net Assets

$8 B

Holdings in Top 10

32.1%

52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH

$56.1
N/A
N/A

Expenses

OPERATING FEES

Expense Ratio 0.17%

SALES FEES

Front Load N/A

Deferred Load N/A

TRADING FEES

Turnover 8.00%

Redemption Fee N/A


Min Investment

Standard (Taxable)

$0

IRA

N/A


Fund Classification

Fund Type

Open End Mutual Fund


Name

As of 06/01/2026

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

$56.15

$8 B

0.85%

$0.48

0.17%

DFSIX - Profile

Distributions

  • YTD Total Return 7.5%
  • 3 Yr Annualized Total Return 20.6%
  • 5 Yr Annualized Total Return 12.0%
  • Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually
  • Net Income Ratio 1.13%
DIVIDENDS
  • Dividend Yield 0.9%
  • Dividend Distribution Frequency Quarterly

Fund Details

  • Legal Name
    U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
  • Fund Family Name
    Dimensional Funds
  • Inception Date
    Apr 11, 2008
  • Shares Outstanding
    N/A
  • Share Class
    Other
  • Currency
    USD
  • Domiciled Country
    US
  • Manager
    Jed Fogdall

Fund Description

To achieve the U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio’s investment objective, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (the “Advisor”) implements an integrated investment approach that combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading functions. As further described below, the Portfolio’s design emphasizes long-term drivers of expected returns identified by the Advisor’s research, while balancing risk through broad diversification across companies and sectors. The Advisor’s portfolio management and trading processes further balance those long-term drivers of expected returns with shorter-term drivers of expected returns and trading costs.

The U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio is designed to purchase a broad and diverse group of securities within a market capitalization weighted universe (e.g., the larger the company, the greater the proportion of the universe it

represents) of U.S. operating companies (the “U.S. Universe”). The Portfolio invests in companies of all sizes and seeks to moderately increase the Portfolio’s exposure to smaller capitalization, lower relative price, and higher profitability companies as compared to their representation in the U.S. Universe, while adjusting the composition of the Portfolio based on sustainability considerations. The Portfolio may seek to achieve a moderately increased exposure to smaller capitalization, lower relative price, and higher profitability companies by decreasing the allocation of the Portfolio’s assets to larger capitalization, higher relative price, or lower profitability companies relative to their weight in the U.S. Universe. An equity issuer is considered to have a high relative price (i.e., a growth stock) primarily because it has a high price in relation to its book value. An equity issuer is considered to have a low relative price (i.e., a value stock) primarily because it has a low price in relation to its book value. In assessing relative price, the Advisor may consider additional factors such as price to cash flow or price to earnings ratios. An equity issuer is considered to have high profitability because it has high earnings or profits from operations in relation to its book value or assets. The criteria the Advisor uses for assessing relative price and profitability are subject to change from time to time. Additionally, the representation of securities in the Portfolio as compared to their representation in the U.S. Universe may be affected by the Portfolio's sustainability considerations.

As a non-fundamental policy, under normal circumstances, the U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio will invest at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. companies. The Advisor generally defines a U.S. company as one that is listed and principally traded on a securities exchange in the United States that is deemed appropriate by the Advisor. The percentage by which the Portfolio’s allocation to securities of the largest U.S. high relative price companies is reduced will change due to market movements, sustainability considerations and other factors.

The Advisor may also increase or reduce the U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio’s exposure to an eligible company, or exclude a company, based on shorter-term considerations, such as a company’s price momentum, short-run reversals, and investment characteristics. In assessing a company’s investment characteristics, the Advisor considers ratios such as recent changes in assets divided by total assets. The criteria the Advisor uses for assessing a company’s investment characteristics are subject to change from time to time. In addition, the Advisor seeks to reduce trading costs using a flexible trading approach that looks for opportunities to participate in the available market liquidity, while managing turnover and explicit transaction costs.

The U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio also may purchase or sell futures contracts and options on futures contracts for U.S. equity securities and indices, to increase or decrease equity market exposure based on actual or expected cash inflows to or outflows from the Portfolio. The above-referenced investments are not subject to, although they may incorporate, the Portfolio’s sustainability considerations.

The U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio may lend its portfolio securities to generate additional income.

The Advisor intends to take into account certain sustainability considerations when making investment decisions for the U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio. Relative to a fund without these considerations that otherwise has the same investment objective, strategies, and policies as the Portfolio, the Portfolio will generally have excluded, and have less overall weight in, securities of companies that, according to the Portfolio’s sustainability considerations, may be less sustainable as compared to other companies in the Portfolio’s investment universe. Similarly, relative to such a fund, the Portfolio will generally have more overall weight in securities of companies that, according to the Portfolio’s sustainability considerations, may be more sustainable as compared to other companies in the Portfolio’s investment universe. In particular, the Advisor ranks companies (i) relative to the broader equity market based on potential emissions from reserves and scaled potential emissions from reserves and the securities of the worst-ranking companies are generally underweighted or excluded, (ii) relative to the applicable universe of securities based on carbon intensity and the securities of the worst-ranking companies are generally underweighted or excluded and (iii) relative to their sector peers based primarily on carbon intensity, but also considering several other factors, including controversies related to land use and biodiversity, toxic spills and releases, operational waste, and water management, and the securities of the worst-ranking companies are generally underweighted or excluded and the securities of the remaining companies are generally overweighted or neutral-weighted. In addition, the Advisor seeks to exclude securities of companies based on sustainability considerations relating to coal, factory farming, palm oil, cluster munitions and landmines, tobacco, child labor, civilian firearms, private prisons, and material involvement in severe environmental, social, or governance controversies that indicate operations inconsistent with responsible business conduct standards (such as those defined by the United Nations Global Compact Principles and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises). For a more detailed description of these sustainability considerations, see “Applying the Portfolios’ Sustainability Considerations”. The Advisor engages third party service providers to provide research information

relating to the Portfolio’s sustainability considerations with respect to securities in the Portfolio, where information is available from such providers. The Advisor also may use, or supplement third party service providers’ data with, proprietary research relating to certain sustainability considerations where information is not available or has not been obtained from third party service providers engaged by the Advisor.

The Advisor periodically reviews the Portfolio’s sustainability considerations and the Portfolio may periodically modify, add, or remove sustainability considerations.

Read More

DFSIX - Performance

Return Ranking - Trailing

Period DFSIX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 7.5% -13.2% 43.7% 72.95%
1 Yr 25.1% -15.7% 101.9% 55.68%
3 Yr 20.6%* 1.1% 41.0% 40.83%
5 Yr 12.0%* -3.9% 19.6% 52.11%
10 Yr 14.9%* 5.8% 55.9% 28.59%

* Annualized

Return Ranking - Calendar

Period DFSIX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2025 14.8% -25.2% 36.9% 18.33%
2024 21.9% -51.6% 37.0% 17.44%
2023 24.0% -15.6% 47.4% 22.79%
2022 -18.9% -56.3% 1.1% 22.53%
2021 24.6% -27.2% 537.8% 17.21%

Total Return Ranking - Trailing

Period DFSIX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 7.5% -13.2% 43.7% 72.95%
1 Yr 25.1% -15.7% 101.9% 55.68%
3 Yr 20.6%* 1.1% 41.0% 40.83%
5 Yr 12.0%* -3.9% 19.6% 52.11%
10 Yr 14.9%* 5.8% 55.9% 28.59%

* Annualized

Total Return Ranking - Calendar

Period DFSIX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2025 15.9% -3.4% 43.4% 57.36%
2024 23.2% -20.1% 44.5% 48.46%
2023 25.7% 0.3% 47.4% 38.07%
2022 -17.8% -31.9% 11.0% 46.57%
2021 27.4% 4.1% 537.8% 42.84%

NAV & Total Return History


DFSIX - Holdings

Concentration Analysis

DFSIX Category Low Category High DFSIX % Rank
Net Assets 8 B 3.76 M 2.2 T 23.17%
Number of Holdings 1962 2 3885 3.17%
Net Assets in Top 10 2.57 B 3.24 M 639 B 28.02%
Weighting of Top 10 32.14% 2.5% 102.7% 82.30%

Top 10 Holdings

  1. NVIDIA Corp. 7.65%
  2. Apple, Inc. 6.31%
  3. Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.20%
  4. Amazon.com, Inc. 2.99%
  5. Microsoft Corp. 2.52%
  6. Alphabet, Inc. 2.25%
  7. Broadcom, Inc. 2.24%
  8. Alphabet, Inc. 1.94%
  9. JPMorgan Chase Co. 1.67%
  10. DFA Investment Trust Co. 1.36%

Asset Allocation

Weighting Return Low Return High DFSIX % Rank
Stocks
101.11% 0.00% 105.13% 0.53%
Cash
1.57% 0.00% 69.97% 32.07%
Other
0.00% -13.91% 100.00% 28.81%
Preferred Stocks
0.00% 0.00% 5.74% 54.71%
Convertible Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 5.54% 51.90%
Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 136.21% 53.83%

Stock Sector Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High DFSIX % Rank
Technology
20.97% 0.00% 48.94% 71.34%
Financial Services
17.40% 0.00% 55.59% 15.72%
Healthcare
15.43% 0.00% 52.29% 29.83%
Consumer Cyclical
13.12% 0.00% 30.33% 10.51%
Industrials
12.27% 0.00% 29.90% 14.82%
Communication Services
8.52% 0.00% 27.94% 50.58%
Consumer Defense
6.90% 0.00% 47.71% 47.26%
Basic Materials
2.66% 0.00% 19.45% 43.58%
Energy
1.53% 0.00% 41.64% 82.75%
Utilities
0.81% 0.00% 15.25% 80.23%
Real Estate
0.39% 0.00% 31.91% 84.10%

Stock Geographic Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High DFSIX % Rank
US
101.11% 0.00% 101.31% 0.26%
Non US
0.00% 0.00% 70.69% 60.79%

DFSIX - Expenses

Operational Fees

DFSIX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Expense Ratio 0.17% 0.01% 4.93% 89.17%
Management Fee 0.14% 0.00% 1.89% 15.66%
12b-1 Fee N/A 0.00% 1.00% N/A
Administrative Fee N/A 0.00% 0.85% 1.39%

Sales Fees

DFSIX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Front Load N/A 1.00% 5.75% N/A
Deferred Load N/A 1.00% 4.00% N/A

Trading Fees

DFSIX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Max Redemption Fee N/A 0.25% 2.00% N/A

Related Fees

Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.

DFSIX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Turnover 8.00% 0.00% 268.00% 22.19%

DFSIX - Distributions

Dividend Yield Analysis

DFSIX Category Low Category High DFSIX % Rank
Dividend Yield 0.85% 0.00% 25.47% 56.92%

Dividend Distribution Analysis

DFSIX Category Low Category High Category Mod
Dividend Distribution Frequency Quarterly Annual Quarterly Quarterly

Net Income Ratio Analysis

DFSIX Category Low Category High DFSIX % Rank
Net Income Ratio 1.13% -54.00% 2.44% 26.01%

Capital Gain Distribution Analysis

DFSIX Category Low Category High Capital Mode
Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually Annually Semi-Annually Annually

Distributions History

View More +

DFSIX - Fund Manager Analysis

Managers

Jed Fogdall


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Feb 28, 2012

10.26

10.3%

Jed S. Fogdall is a Co-Head of Portfolio Management and Vice President of Dimensional and a member of Dimensional’s Investment Committee. Mr. Fogdall has an MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles and a BS from Purdue University. Mr. Fogdall joined Dimensional as a Portfolio Manager in 2004 and has been responsible for international portfolios since 2010 and domestic portfolios since 2012.

Mary Phillips


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Feb 28, 2022

0.25

0.3%

Mary T. Phillips, CFA, Deputy Head of Portfolio Management, North America, Senior Portfolio Manager and Vice President of Dimensional, joined Dimensional in 2012 and has been a portfolio manager since 2014. Ms. Phillips began managing Dimensional’s allocated portion of the Fund’s portfolio in March 2018. Ms. Phillips earned an MBA with concentration in analytic finance, statistics and econometrics, and managerial and organizational behavior from the University of Chicago and a BA from the University of Puget Sound.

John Hertzer


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Feb 28, 2022

0.25

0.3%

Mr. Hertzer joined DFA in 2013. Mr. Hertzer began his investment career in 2004 and earned a B.A. from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the University of California Los Angeles.

Tenure Analysis

Category Low Category High Category Average Category Mode
0.04 39.02 7.35 2.25