Continue to site >
Trending ETFs

Name

As of 05/24/2024

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

$21.49

$2.68 M

0.00%

0.49%

Vitals

YTD Return

3.7%

1 yr return

19.4%

3 Yr Avg Return

N/A

5 Yr Avg Return

N/A

Net Assets

$2.68 M

Holdings in Top 10

31.8%

52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH

$21.1
$15.86
$21.67

Expenses

OPERATING FEES

Expense Ratio 0.49%

SALES FEES

Front Load N/A

Deferred Load N/A

TRADING FEES

Turnover N/A

Redemption Fee N/A


Min Investment

Standard (Taxable)

N/A

IRA

N/A


Fund Classification

Fund Type

Exchange Traded Fund


Name

As of 05/24/2024

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

$21.49

$2.68 M

0.00%

0.49%

MVPS - Profile

Distributions

  • YTD Total Return 3.7%
  • 3 Yr Annualized Total Return N/A
  • 5 Yr Annualized Total Return N/A
  • Capital Gain Distribution Frequency N/A
  • Net Income Ratio N/A
DIVIDENDS
  • Dividend Yield 0.0%
  • Dividend Distribution Frequency Annual

Fund Details

  • Legal Name
    Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
  • Fund Family Name
    N/A
  • Inception Date
    Jul 20, 2021
  • Shares Outstanding
    N/A
  • Share Class
    N/A
  • Currency
    USD
  • Domiciled Country
    US
  • Manager
    Charles Ragauss

Fund Description

The Fund will, under normal market conditions, invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in the securities that comprise the Index. The Fund employs a “passive management” investment strategy in seeking to achieve its investment objective. Using an indexing investment approach, the Fund attempts to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Index. The Fund generally will use a replication methodology, meaning it will invest in all of the underlying securities comprising the Index in proportion to the weightings in the Index. However, the Fund may utilize a sampling methodology under various circumstances where it may not be possible or practicable to purchase all of the underlying securities in the Index. The Fund’s investment sub-adviser, Toroso Investments, LLC (“Toroso,” or the “Sub-Adviser”) manages the investment of the Fund’s assets. The Index was created and is maintained by ETF Action, Inc. (the “Index Provider”). The Index Provider is not affiliated with the Fund, Amplify Investments LLC (the “Adviser” or “Amplify Investments”) or the Sub-Adviser.

Index Strategy. The Index seeks to provide access to the equity securities of a diversified basket of U.S. and non-U.S. companies that are owned by exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) included in select “thematic” market segments identified below. The Fund invests in the underlying securities held by the ETFs, which include common stocks and/or depositary receipts. Through the Index methodology described below, the Index seeks to identify the companies (the “Thematic ETF All-Stars”) that are among the largest (by assets under management) and most popular (by the number of ETFs that hold the portfolio company) portfolio companies owned by ETFs in the thematic ETF universe. The Index Provider relies on publicly available information to identify companies for inclusion in the Index. The thematic universe includes portfolio companies held by ETFs with strategies seeking to capture investment opportunities in one of the below thematic segments. Each thematic segment is comprised of companies that include thematic sub-groups, as classified by the Index Provider, which further represent the thematic segment. These segments include:

Disruptive Technology: ETFs that seek to track companies that support technology infrastructure for continued innovation across all sectors of the economy. As of the date of this prospectus, the Disruptive Technology thematic segment includes companies from the following thematic sub-groups: advertising & marketing, big data, cloud computing, connectivity, cyber security and digital infrastructure.
Evolving Consumer: ETFs that seek to track companies participating in evolving consumer trends. As of the date of this prospectus, the Evolving Consumer thematic segment includes companies from the following thematic sub-groups: aging population, health & wellness, online retail, pet ownership, pro sports, streaming services, eSports & video games and casinos & gaming.
FinTech: ETFs that seek to track companies involved with technologies that are disrupting the traditional ways professionals deliver and consumers manage investments, banking, and other financial services. As of the date of this prospectus, the FinTech thematic segment includes companies from the following thematic sub-groups: blockchain, digital payments and peer-to-peer lending.
Health Care Innovation: ETFs that seek to track companies involved with innovations addressing the many challenges across the health care industry, including chronic diseases, aging population, and rising health care costs. As of the date of this prospectus, the Health Care Innovation thematic segment includes companies from the following thematic sub-groups: cancer immunotherapy, genomics, telemedicine & digital health and biotechnology.
Industrial Revolution: ETFs that seek to track companies driving change in manufacturing, transportation, aerospace/defense, and mining and production of advanced (high tech) materials. As of the date of this prospectus, the Industrial Revolution thematic segment includes companies from the following thematic sub-groups: 3D printing, advanced materials, security & defense, robotics & AI, space and next generation transportation.
Sustainability: ETFs that seek to track companies whose products and services are designed to limit the depletion and/or destruction of natural resources. As of the date of this prospectus, the Sustainability thematic segment includes companies from the following thematic sub-groups: clean energy: solar, hydrogen, and wind, smart infrastructure, water, and waste management.
Multi-Theme: ETFs that seek to track companies in two or more of the thematic segments detailed above.

ETFs that by design exclude U.S. domiciled companies or only invest in emerging market companies, but would otherwise qualify for the thematic universe, are excluded from the Index. In addition, Cannabis ETFs are currently excluded from the Index qualifying ETF universe.

Index Methodology. The initial universe of eligible companies is established by including all companies held by ETFs in a qualifying thematic universe. Of the companies in this initial universe, the Index Provider establishes a rating for each eligible company by calculating its ownership-adjusted market value (“OAMV”). To calculate OAMV, the Index Provider multiplies (i) the sum of the dollar amounts (based on the assets under management (“AUM”)) invested in an eligible company by all qualifying ETFs, subject to a 10% single ETF ownership influence cap described below, by (ii) the number of qualifying ETFs that hold the company. This total is then divided by the sum of all eligible companies OAMVs. The 10% ownership influence cap limits any qualifying ETF from being greater than 10% of its thematic segment. If the calculation in (i) above results in a qualifying ETF to own greater than 10% of the total AUM in its thematic segment, the calculation for the eligible companies held by the qualifying ETF in (i) above are reduced to the 10% cap with respect to that qualifying ETF and the OAMV of the eligible companies are recalculated using the capped amounts. From the selection list, the Index establishes the Thematic ETF All-Stars as those companies within the top 75% of total OAMV for each thematic segment. As of February 6, 2024, the Index had 122 constituents.

Weighting of Underlying Securities and Rebalancing. Constituents in the Index are weighted based on each company’s OAMV. No single company may represent more than 5% of the Index, and any excess weight is prorated among remaining constituents. The Index is reconstituted and rebalanced monthly, effective at the close of the first Friday of each calendar month. In the event U.S. markets are closed on that date, the Index will be rebalanced at the close of the next open market session.

Diversification Status. The Fund is classified as “non-diversified” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

Read More

MVPS - Performance

Return Ranking - Trailing

Period MVPS Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 3.7% -38.5% 31.2% 94.55%
1 Yr 19.4% -67.1% 39.2% N/A
3 Yr N/A* -40.8% 30.6% N/A
5 Yr N/A* -33.3% 22.3% N/A
10 Yr N/A* -16.3% 23.9% N/A

* Annualized

Return Ranking - Calendar

Period MVPS Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2023 40.1% -73.9% 35.7% N/A
2022 -42.1% -25.6% 73.1% N/A
2021 N/A -97.5% 60.0% N/A
2020 N/A -24.7% 44.9% N/A
2019 N/A -22.9% 38.5% N/A

Total Return Ranking - Trailing

Period MVPS Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 3.7% -75.9% 954.2% 94.16%
1 Yr 19.4% -67.1% 66.6% N/A
3 Yr N/A* -40.8% 30.6% N/A
5 Yr N/A* -33.3% 30.0% N/A
10 Yr N/A* -16.3% 23.9% N/A

* Annualized

Total Return Ranking - Calendar

Period MVPS Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2023 40.1% -73.9% 35.7% N/A
2022 -42.1% -25.6% 73.1% N/A
2021 N/A -97.5% 60.0% N/A
2020 N/A -24.7% 44.9% N/A
2019 N/A -22.9% 43.6% N/A

MVPS - Holdings

Concentration Analysis

MVPS Category Low Category High MVPS % Rank
Net Assets 2.68 M 863 K 50.4 B 88.15%
Number of Holdings 124 1 470 5.79%
Net Assets in Top 10 792 K 0 30.3 B 88.42%
Weighting of Top 10 31.79% 7.6% 100.0% 88.06%

Top 10 Holdings

  1. NVIDIA Corp 6.50%
  2. Tesla Inc 3.95%
  3. Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 3.13%
  4. Alphabet Inc 2.96%
  5. Coinbase Global Inc 2.81%
  6. Microsoft Corp 2.73%
  7. Block Inc 2.66%
  8. Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.53%
  9. Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.38%
  10. First Solar Inc 2.14%

Asset Allocation

Weighting Return Low Return High MVPS % Rank
Stocks
99.73% 0.00% 100.53% 27.65%
Cash
1.38% -0.53% 100.00% 68.17%
Preferred Stocks
0.39% 0.00% 2.84% 59.81%
Other
0.00% -1.08% 26.87% 62.06%
Convertible Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 0.40% 58.20%
Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 4.72% 59.49%

Stock Sector Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High MVPS % Rank
Utilities
0.00% 0.00% 6.27% 3.55%
Technology
0.00% 2.80% 100.00% 68.71%
Real Estate
0.00% 0.00% 15.05% 15.48%
Industrials
0.00% 0.00% 53.73% 12.90%
Healthcare
0.00% 0.00% 43.58% 19.35%
Financial Services
0.00% 0.00% 52.54% 64.52%
Energy
0.00% 0.00% 7.96% 58.71%
Communication Services
0.00% 0.00% 97.05% 53.55%
Consumer Defense
0.00% 0.00% 5.64% 64.19%
Consumer Cyclical
0.00% 0.00% 51.15% 26.13%
Basic Materials
0.00% 0.00% 36.08% 1.94%

Stock Geographic Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High MVPS % Rank
US
93.79% 0.00% 100.53% 57.56%
Non US
5.94% 0.00% 99.27% 33.76%

MVPS - Expenses

Operational Fees

MVPS Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Expense Ratio 0.49% 0.08% 2.97% 78.78%
Management Fee 0.49% 0.00% 1.95% 18.06%
12b-1 Fee N/A 0.00% 1.00% 25.85%
Administrative Fee N/A 0.02% 0.50% N/A

Sales Fees

MVPS Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Front Load N/A 0.00% 5.75% N/A
Deferred Load N/A 1.00% 4.00% N/A

Trading Fees

MVPS Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Max Redemption Fee N/A 1.00% 2.00% N/A

Related Fees

Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.

MVPS Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Turnover N/A 0.00% 281.00% 66.00%

MVPS - Distributions

Dividend Yield Analysis

MVPS Category Low Category High MVPS % Rank
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.00% 42.10% 64.54%

Dividend Distribution Analysis

MVPS Category Low Category High Category Mod
Dividend Distribution Frequency Annual Annually Monthly Annually

Net Income Ratio Analysis

MVPS Category Low Category High MVPS % Rank
Net Income Ratio N/A -2.30% 2.08% 38.76%

Capital Gain Distribution Analysis

MVPS Category Low Category High Capital Mode
Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually Annually Annually

Distributions History

View More +

MVPS - Fund Manager Analysis

Managers

Charles Ragauss


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Jul 20, 2021

0.86

0.9%

Mr. Ragauss currently serves as Director of Product Management at CSat Investment Advisory, having joined the it in April 2016. Prior to joiningCSat Investment Advisory, Mr. Ragauss was Assistant Vice President at Huntington National Bank (“Huntington”), where he was Product Manager for the Huntington Funds and Huntington Strategy Shares ETFs, a combined fund complex of almost $4 billion in assets under management. At Huntington, he led ETF development bringing to market some of the first actively managed ETFs. Mr. Ragauss joined Huntington in 2010. Mr. Ragauss attended Grand Valley State University where he received his Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance and International Business, as well as a minor in French. He is a member of both the National and West Michigan CFA societies and holds the CFA designation.

Qiao Duan


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Jul 20, 2021

0.86

0.9%

Ms. Qiao Duan serves as Portfolio Manager at Exponential ETFs, having joined the firm in February 2017, where she is responsible for day-to-day management of client portfolios, quantitative research, and portfolio trading. Her experience spans domestic and international equities, fixed income, and derivatives. Ms. Duan received a Master of Science in Quantitative Finance and Risk Management from the University of Michigan in 2016 and a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics and Applied Mathematics from Xiamen University in 2014. She is a candidate in the CFA Program.

Tenure Analysis

Category Low Category High Category Average Category Mode
0.04 32.43 7.88 2.12