Steward Values Enhanced International Fund
Name
As of 06/01/2026Price
Aum/Mkt Cap
YIELD
Exp Ratio
Watchlist
Vitals
YTD Return
11.1%
1 yr return
27.9%
3 Yr Avg Return
20.5%
5 Yr Avg Return
9.9%
Net Assets
$302 M
Holdings in Top 10
41.2%
52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH
Expenses
OPERATING FEES
Expense Ratio 0.77%
SALES FEES
Front Load N/A
Deferred Load N/A
TRADING FEES
Turnover N/A
Redemption Fee N/A
Min Investment
Standard (Taxable)
$100,000
IRA
N/A
Fund Classification
Fund Type
Open End Mutual Fund
Name
As of 06/01/2026Price
Aum/Mkt Cap
YIELD
Exp Ratio
Watchlist
SNTCX - Profile
Distributions
- YTD Total Return 11.1%
- 3 Yr Annualized Total Return 20.5%
- 5 Yr Annualized Total Return 9.9%
- Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually
- Net Income Ratio 1.86%
- Dividend Yield 1.8%
- Dividend Distribution Frequency Annual
Fund Details
-
Legal NameSteward Values Enhanced International Fund
-
Fund Family NameCrossmark Global Investments, Inc.
-
Inception DateMar 31, 2006
-
Shares OutstandingN/A
-
Share ClassInstl
-
CurrencyUSD
-
Domiciled CountryUS
-
ManagerJohn Wolf
Fund Description
Under normal circumstances, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the securities of non-U.S. companies that pass the Fund’s values-based screens.* Generally, at least 80% of the Fund’s total assets will be in investments in the form
of depositary receipts (“DRs”) or dual listed securities representing securities of companies located or domiciled outside of the United States that pass the Fund’s values-based screens.* These DRs will primarily be sponsored, but the Fund may, on occasion, invest in unsponsored DRs when appropriate sponsored DRs are not available. The Fund will invest in securities of issuers throughout the world, and, under normal conditions, substantially all of its non-cash assets will be invested in securities of non-U.S. issuers. The Fund may invest up to 40% of its assets in securities of issuers in the S&P Emerging 50 ADR Index.** The Fund may also invest in other investment companies and real estate investment trusts.
The Fund is an actively-managed fund. As further described below, the Fund’s investments are allocated in an attempt to generally match the weightings of and align with the risk profile of the Fund’s blended benchmark index (defined below), as modified by any change by portfolio management in the relative allocation between securities of non-U.S. developed market (“developed market”) companies and securities of emerging market companies based on portfolio management’s broad market view, subject to the application of the Fund’s values-based screening policies (see “Values-based Screens” below) and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting in the blended benchmark index (as may be modified by portfolio management as described above) among certain remaining securities of companies based on whether they, through their activities, both externally and internally, seek to reduce risk and create long-term resilience through sustainable and responsible business practices. Crossmark believes that such companies exhibit positive values, including, but not limited to, the fair treatment of employees, respect for the environment, positive engagement with the communities in which they operate, and responsible governance practices. A company’s scores with respect to such sustainable and responsible business practices (positive value scores) are based on data and ratings generated by one or more third-party providers unaffiliated with Crossmark. In determining the relative allocation between securities of developed market companies and securities of emerging market companies, portfolio management considers macro-economic and other relevant factors, including the performance of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. Portfolio management evaluates such allocations on an ongoing basis. The Fund’s blended benchmark index is a blend of two widely recognized indexes, one comprised of securities of companies in developed markets and one comprised of securities of companies in emerging markets, and is the same index as the second index identified in the Average Annual Total Returns table below.
Portfolio management starts with the universe of securities in the blended benchmark index and then applies the values-based screens described below to seek to avoid investments in a list of prohibited companies. An optimization process is then applied to the remaining securities designed to (1) generally match the weightings of and align with the risk profile of the blended benchmark index and (2) add a minimum upweight of 0.10% to the blended benchmark index weightings of a number of remaining portfolio companies that have the highest positive value
scores, although the upweight added to any these portfolio companies may be higher than 0.10% above the blended benchmark index weight pursuant to the optimization process. The number of remaining portfolio companies that receive a minimum upweight of 0.10% above the blended benchmark index weight will be equal to the aggregate percentage weighting of the screened securities. For example, if the aggregate percentage weighting of the screened securities is 20%, the 20 remaining portfolio companies with the highest positive value scores would each have their weighting in the portfolio increased by at least 0.10% above the blended benchmark index weight. For purposes of the description of the investment process in this paragraph, references to the blended benchmark index should be read to mean the blended benchmark index as its weightings may be modified by portfolio management between securities of developed market companies and securities of emerging market companies from time to time.
In the event of changes by portfolio management to the relative allocation between securities of developed market companies and securities of emerging market companies in the blended benchmark index, changes in the weightings of such companies within the blended benchmark index, changes to the list of prohibited companies pursuant to the values-based screens or changes in the positive value scores of the portfolio companies, portfolio management will rebalance the Fund’s portfolio in an attempt to generally match the weightings of and align with the risk profile of the blended benchmark index (as may be modified by portfolio management as described above), subject to the application of the Fund’s values-based screening policies and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting as described above. Because of portfolio management’s relative allocation decisions between developed market companies and emerging market companies, the values-based screens and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting, the Fund’s portfolio will differ from the blended benchmark index and the Fund will perform differently than the blended benchmark index. The impact of portfolio management’s relative allocation decisions, the values-based screens and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting on the Fund’s performance relative to the blended benchmark index will vary over time depending on market conditions, although performance differences are expected to be driven primarily by portfolio management’s relative allocation decisions and the values-based screens.
Values-based Screens. As noted above, in implementing its investment strategies, the Fund applies a set of values-based screens to use its best efforts to avoid investing in companies that are determined by Crossmark, pursuant to screening guidelines approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors, to be: (1) materially involved in the production, distribution, retail, supply or licensing of alcohol or related products; (2) materially involved in the production, distribution, retail, supply or licensing of tobacco or related products (to include vaping and other alternative smoking products); (3) materially involved in gambling (to include the manufacture, distribution and operation of facilities and equipment whose intended use is gambling); (4) directly participating in providing abortions and/or the production of drugs that are used to terminate pregnancy; (5) owning and/or operating facilities where abortions are permitted or leasing real estate to such facilities; (6) directly engaged in scientific research using stem cells derived from human embryos, fetal tissue or human embryo
cloning techniques; (7) directly involved in the production of adult entertainment or materially involved in the distribution or retail of adult entertainment; or (8) directly involved in the production, distribution, retail, supply or licensing of psychoactive recreational cannabis or derivative products.
The Adviser uses data from one or more third-party providers to create a list of companies that exceed the involvement thresholds set forth below and are thus designated as prohibited investments in which the Fund cannot invest. This prohibited investment list is updated by the Adviser quarterly and compared against current Fund holdings to confirm that the Fund does not hold any prohibited investments. If during a quarterly review, a security held in the Fund is identified as being on the prohibited investments list, the Fund will divest, as further discussed below.
Because the Fund uses its best efforts to avoid investments in companies that do not pass the values-based screening criteria, it will divest itself, in a timely manner, of any securities of companies held in the Fund’s portfolio that are later determined not to pass the values-based screening criteria, although the sale may be delayed if such securities are illiquid or if Crossmark determines that an immediate sale would have a negative tax or other effect on the Fund. However, the Fund may invest up to 5% of its total assets in certain collective investment vehicles or derivatives that may hold or derive value from securities issued by otherwise excluded companies.
For purposes of the alcohol, tobacco and gambling screens, material involvement means a company that derives 10% or more of its revenues from any combination of these three categories of screened activities. For purposes of the adult entertainment screen, companies directly involved in the production of adult entertainment (defined as media and materials intended to appeal exclusively to the prurient interest) and companies that derive 2% or more of their revenues from the distribution or retail of adult entertainment are screened. For purposes of the abortion, abortion facilities, stem cell research and cannabis screens, there is no revenue threshold; any direct involvement in the screened activities will cause a company to be screened out of the investment universe. For purposes of the abortion facilities screen, health care real estate investment trusts are categorically screened out of the investment universe. For purposes of the abortion and abortion facilities screens, a company that is not itself directly involved in the screened activities will be screened out of the investment universe if (a) it owns 20% or more of another company that is directly participating in the screened activities, or (b) it is 50% or more owned by another company that is directly participating in the screened activities.
SNTCX - Performance
Return Ranking - Trailing
| Period | SNTCX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | 11.1% | -3.0% | 35.2% | 40.10% |
| 1 Yr | 27.9% | -7.6% | 66.4% | 34.42% |
| 3 Yr | 20.5%* | -0.8% | 30.8% | 16.23% |
| 5 Yr | 9.9%* | -34.2% | 34.0% | 17.05% |
| 10 Yr | 10.1%* | 2.5% | 41.2% | 22.12% |
* Annualized
Return Ranking - Calendar
| Period | SNTCX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23.6% | -64.4% | 46.9% | 55.56% |
| 2024 | -8.3% | -30.9% | 19.1% | 94.53% |
| 2023 | 12.7% | -1.4% | 22.0% | 57.04% |
| 2022 | -14.3% | -90.1% | 71.3% | 10.53% |
| 2021 | 5.7% | -23.1% | 18.9% | 42.27% |
Total Return Ranking - Trailing
| Period | SNTCX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | 11.1% | -3.0% | 35.2% | 40.10% |
| 1 Yr | 27.9% | -7.6% | 66.4% | 34.42% |
| 3 Yr | 20.5%* | -0.8% | 30.8% | 16.23% |
| 5 Yr | 9.9%* | -34.2% | 34.0% | 17.05% |
| 10 Yr | 10.1%* | 2.5% | 41.2% | 22.12% |
* Annualized
Total Return Ranking - Calendar
| Period | SNTCX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33.5% | 6.6% | 54.4% | 29.40% |
| 2024 | 8.6% | -17.9% | 22.0% | 9.91% |
| 2023 | 17.5% | 3.2% | 23.8% | 35.91% |
| 2022 | -11.6% | -89.7% | 144.8% | 11.75% |
| 2021 | 10.9% | -22.6% | 56.0% | 46.00% |
NAV & Total Return History
SNTCX - Holdings
Concentration Analysis
| SNTCX | Category Low | Category High | SNTCX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | 302 M | 3.54 M | 629 B | 76.07% |
| Number of Holdings | 103 | 1 | 10834 | 60.00% |
| Net Assets in Top 10 | 130 M | 1.03 M | 75.3 B | 67.69% |
| Weighting of Top 10 | 41.21% | 5.7% | 103.9% | 11.53% |
Top 10 Holdings
- ASML Holding N.V. NY REGISTRY SHS 8.01%
- HSBC Holdings PLC ADR EACH REPR 5 ORD USD0.50 4.62%
- Unilever PLC SPON ADR NEW 4.30%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. SPON ADS REP 5 ORD TWD10 4.09%
- Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. SPON ADS EACH REP 8 ORD SHS 3.77%
- Shell PLC SPON ADS 3.71%
- SAP SE SPON ADR EA REP 1 ORD NPV 3.66%
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd. SPON ADS EACH REP 0.5 ORD 3.64%
- Banco Santander SA ADR REP 1 ORD EUR0.50 2.76%
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. SPON ADS EACH REP 1 ORD SHS 2.64%
Asset Allocation
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | SNTCX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stocks | 99.63% | 0.00% | 103.91% | 5.13% |
| Cash | 0.37% | -1.24% | 28.70% | 88.89% |
| Preferred Stocks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.20% | 93.50% |
| Other | 0.00% | -4.59% | 9.87% | 85.47% |
| Convertible Bonds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.18% | 89.71% |
| Bonds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 146.29% | 90.09% |
Stock Sector Breakdown
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | SNTCX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 22.13% | 0.18% | 45.44% | 7.37% |
| Technology | 17.87% | 0.30% | 22.37% | 3.16% |
| Energy | 14.36% | 0.00% | 16.89% | 1.05% |
| Basic Materials | 10.83% | 0.00% | 23.86% | 10.88% |
| Communication Services | 10.10% | 0.00% | 21.69% | 7.89% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 8.90% | 0.00% | 21.37% | 76.14% |
| Industrials | 6.20% | 5.17% | 99.49% | 98.60% |
| Healthcare | 3.60% | 0.00% | 20.35% | 98.25% |
| Utilities | 3.01% | 0.00% | 13.68% | 43.51% |
| Consumer Defense | 2.70% | 0.00% | 32.29% | 98.07% |
| Real Estate | 0.32% | 0.00% | 14.59% | 72.46% |
Stock Geographic Breakdown
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | SNTCX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | 99.63% | 0.00% | 100.07% | 2.56% |
| Non US | 0.00% | 0.00% | 99.68% | 98.97% |
SNTCX - Expenses
Operational Fees
| SNTCX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.02% | 13.76% | 67.07% |
| Management Fee | 0.37% | 0.00% | 1.58% | 23.24% |
| 12b-1 Fee | N/A | 0.00% | 1.00% | N/A |
| Administrative Fee | 0.08% | 0.01% | 1.00% | 50.83% |
Sales Fees
| SNTCX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Load | N/A | 3.50% | 5.75% | N/A |
| Deferred Load | N/A | 1.00% | 4.00% | N/A |
Trading Fees
| SNTCX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Redemption Fee | N/A | 1.00% | 2.00% | N/A |
Related Fees
Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.
| SNTCX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover | N/A | 2.00% | 247.00% | 20.20% |
SNTCX - Distributions
Dividend Yield Analysis
| SNTCX | Category Low | Category High | SNTCX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 0.00% | 17.49% | 7.18% |
Dividend Distribution Analysis
| SNTCX | Category Low | Category High | Category Mod | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Distribution Frequency | Annual | Annual | Quarterly | Quarterly |
Net Income Ratio Analysis
| SNTCX | Category Low | Category High | SNTCX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Income Ratio | 1.86% | -0.77% | 3.63% | 41.65% |
Capital Gain Distribution Analysis
| SNTCX | Category Low | Category High | Capital Mode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Gain Distribution Frequency | Annually | Annually | Annually | Annually |
Distributions History
| Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | $0.518 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 18, 2025 | $0.334 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 18, 2025 | $1.214 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $0.658 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $0.256 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $2.976 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $3.890 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2023 | $0.783 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2023 | $0.198 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 16, 2022 | $0.406 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 16, 2022 | $0.245 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 17, 2021 | $0.923 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 11, 2021 | $0.128 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 12, 2021 | $0.088 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 18, 2020 | $0.626 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 11, 2020 | $0.084 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 12, 2020 | $0.094 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 13, 2020 | $0.095 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 20, 2019 | $0.141 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 13, 2019 | $0.136 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 15, 2019 | $0.132 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2018 | $0.094 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 14, 2018 | $0.156 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 15, 2018 | $0.204 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 16, 2018 | $0.029 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 15, 2017 | $0.143 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 15, 2017 | $0.150 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 16, 2017 | $0.199 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 17, 2017 | $0.029 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 23, 2016 | $0.122 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 16, 2016 | $0.111 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 17, 2016 | $0.167 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 18, 2016 | $0.037 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 28, 2015 | $0.101 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 18, 2015 | $0.135 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 19, 2015 | $0.494 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 20, 2015 | $0.058 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 19, 2014 | $0.050 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 19, 2014 | $0.142 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 20, 2014 | $0.368 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 21, 2014 | $0.107 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 20, 2013 | $0.138 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 20, 2013 | $0.119 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 21, 2013 | $0.241 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 22, 2013 | $0.032 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2012 | $0.152 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 24, 2012 | $0.106 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 22, 2012 | $0.220 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 22, 2012 | $0.058 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 22, 2011 | $0.128 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 22, 2011 | $0.132 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 20, 2011 | $0.237 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 21, 2011 | $0.067 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 22, 2010 | $0.106 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 23, 2010 | $0.072 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 21, 2010 | $0.207 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 22, 2010 | $0.088 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 31, 2009 | $0.036 | ExtraDividend |
| Dec 22, 2009 | $0.050 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 23, 2009 | $0.137 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 22, 2009 | $0.181 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 23, 2009 | $0.065 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 22, 2008 | $0.118 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 22, 2008 | $0.061 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Sep 22, 2008 | $0.257 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 20, 2008 | $0.179 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 24, 2008 | $0.172 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 24, 2007 | $0.213 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 24, 2007 | $0.219 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 24, 2007 | $1.108 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Sep 24, 2007 | $0.037 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 21, 2007 | $0.388 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 21, 2007 | $0.057 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 22, 2006 | $0.081 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 22, 2006 | $0.074 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Sep 25, 2006 | $0.093 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 22, 2006 | $0.247 | OrdinaryDividend |
SNTCX - Fund Manager Analysis
Managers
John Wolf
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Feb 28, 2006
16.26
16.3%
Mr. Wolf is a Managing Director and Head of Equity Investments at Crossmark Global Investments, Inc. Mr. Wolf began his career in 1983 with the Dreyfus Corporation and in 1987 joined Oppenheimer Capital as an accounting manager supervising both equity and fixed income mutual funds. In 1992, Mr. Wolf joined New Castle Advisers, which managed fixed income portfolios and mutual funds. In 1996, New Castle Advisers was acquired by Capstone where Mr. Wolf served in his current capacity. Mr. Wolf received his Bachelor’s Degree from Hofstra University and his Master’s Degree from Manhattan College.
Brent Lium
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Dec 20, 2019
2.45
2.5%
Brent Lium joined Crossmark in November of 2019 as Managing Director with over 24 years of industry experience. His primary role is co-managing the Steward Enhanced Index Funds and the Large Cap Core Growth product. Brent started his investment career in 1995 with Dean Witter in Dallas. Following business school in 2001, he joined Invesco Ltd as an equity analyst on a growth mutual fund team. There he developed his extensive bottoms-up fundamental equity research abilities. He rounded out his top down strategy skills after being promoted to portfolio manager a few years later. Brent earned a BBA in Accounting from Texas A&M University and an MBA in Finance from the University of Texas - Austin. He is also a CFA Charterholder. He lives in West University Place, TX with his wife Carrie and three children. When he is not at one of his kid’s sporting events or activities, he loves to travel and do any outdoor activity.
Ryan Caylor
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Mar 23, 2020
2.19
2.2%
Ryan joined Crossmark in June of 2016 and currently serves as a Portfolio Manager & Head of Research. He is responsible for generating independent and differentiated fundamental research on markets, sectors, and individual companies in support of Crossmark's Portfolio Managers and Investment Teams. Prior to joining Capstone, Ryan was a sell-side Equity Research Associate at Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH) covering competitive power and electric utility stocks. Prior to TPH, Ryan was an Associate in the Energy Valuation Group at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ryan graduated from Tulane University in New Orleans with an undergraduate degree in Finance, as well as Masters degrees in Accounting and Finance. He currently holds his Series 7, 63, 86, and 87 securities licenses.
Tenure Analysis
| Category Low | Category High | Category Average | Category Mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.08 | 30.35 | 6.45 | 3.25 |