Steward Values Enhanced Small-Mid Cap Fund
Name
As of 06/01/2026Price
Aum/Mkt Cap
YIELD
Exp Ratio
Watchlist
Vitals
YTD Return
13.2%
1 yr return
27.4%
3 Yr Avg Return
14.2%
5 Yr Avg Return
6.7%
Net Assets
$189 M
Holdings in Top 10
5.8%
52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH
Expenses
OPERATING FEES
Expense Ratio 0.64%
SALES FEES
Front Load N/A
Deferred Load N/A
TRADING FEES
Turnover N/A
Redemption Fee N/A
Min Investment
Standard (Taxable)
$100,000
IRA
N/A
Fund Classification
Fund Type
Open End Mutual Fund
Name
As of 06/01/2026Price
Aum/Mkt Cap
YIELD
Exp Ratio
Watchlist
SCECX - Profile
Distributions
- YTD Total Return 13.2%
- 3 Yr Annualized Total Return 14.2%
- 5 Yr Annualized Total Return 6.7%
- Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually
- Net Income Ratio 0.51%
- Dividend Yield 0.7%
- Dividend Distribution Frequency Annual
Fund Details
-
Legal NameSteward Values Enhanced Small-Mid Cap Fund
-
Fund Family NameCrossmark Global Investments, Inc.
-
Inception DateMar 24, 2017
-
Shares OutstandingN/A
-
Share ClassInstl
-
CurrencyUSD
-
Domiciled CountryUS
-
ManagerBrent Lium
Fund Description
Under normal circumstances, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the securities of small- to mid-cap companies included in the Fund’s benchmark index that pass the Fund’s values-based screens.* Small- to mid-cap companies are defined by the market capitalization range of the Fund’s benchmark index, the S&P 1000® Index, from time to time. This market capitalization range, as of
June 30, 2025, is $62 million to $24.25 billion. The S&P 1000® Index is a widely recognized small-mid-cap index, and the companies included in the S&P 1000® Index represent a broad spectrum of the U.S. economy and are generally U.S. issuers. Fund investments may also include other investment companies and real estate investment trusts.
The Fund is an actively-managed fund. As further described below, the Fund’s investments are allocated in an attempt to generally match the weightings of and align with the risk profile of the benchmark index, subject to the application of the Fund’s values-based screening policies (see “Values-based Screens” below) and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting in the benchmark index among certain remaining securities of companies based on whether they, through their activities, both externally and internally, seek to reduce risk and create long-term resilience through sustainable and responsible business practices. Crossmark believes that such companies exhibit positive values, including, but not limited to, the fair treatment of employees, respect for the environment, positive engagement with the communities in which they operate, and responsible governance practices. A company’s scores with respect to such sustainable and responsible business practices (positive value scores) are based on data and ratings generated by one or more third-party providers unaffiliated with Crossmark.
Portfolio management starts with the universe of securities in the benchmark index and then applies the values-based screens described below to seek to avoid investments in a list of prohibited companies. An optimization process is then applied to the remaining securities designed to (1) generally match the weightings of and align with the risk profile of the benchmark index and (2) add a minimum upweight of 0.10% to the benchmark index weightings of the securities of the remaining portfolio companies that have the highest positive value scores until the aggregate weighting of the screened securities has been reallocated. For example, if the aggregate weighting of the screened securities is 8% of the universe, then the 80 remaining portfolio companies with the highest positive value scores would each have their weighting in the portfolio increased by at least 0.10% above the benchmark index weight, although the upweight added to any these 80 portfolio companies may be higher than 0.10% above the benchmark index weight pursuant to the optimization process. In the event of changes to the companies included in the benchmark index, changes in the weightings of such companies within the benchmark index, changes to the list of prohibited companies pursuant to the values-based screens or changes in the positive value scores of the portfolio companies, portfolio management will rebalance the Fund’s portfolio in an attempt to generally match the weightings of and align with the risk profile of the benchmark index, subject to the application of the Fund’s values-based screening policies and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting as described above. Because of the values-based screens and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting, the Fund’s portfolio will differ from the benchmark index and the Fund will perform differently than the benchmark index. The impact of the values-based screens and the reallocation of a portion of each screened security’s weighting on the Fund’s performance relative to the benchmark index will vary over time depending on market conditions.
Values-based Screens. As noted above, in implementing its investment strategies, the Fund applies a set of values-based screens to use its best efforts to avoid investing in companies that are determined by Crossmark, pursuant to screening guidelines approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors, to be: (1) materially involved in the production, distribution, retail, supply or licensing of alcohol or related products; (2) materially involved in the production, distribution, retail, supply or licensing of tobacco or related products (to include vaping and other alternative smoking products); (3) materially involved in gambling (to include the manufacture, distribution and operation of facilities and equipment whose intended use is gambling); (4) directly participating in providing abortions and/or the production of drugs that are used to terminate pregnancy; (5) owning and/or operating facilities where abortions are permitted or leasing real estate to such facilities; (6) directly engaged in scientific research using stem cells derived from human embryos, fetal tissue or human embryo cloning techniques; (7) directly involved in the production of adult entertainment or materially involved in the distribution or retail of adult entertainment; or (8) directly involved in the production, distribution, retail, supply or licensing of psychoactive recreational cannabis or derivative products.
The Adviser uses data from one or more third-party providers to create a list of companies that exceed the involvement thresholds set forth below and are thus designated as prohibited investments in which the Fund cannot invest. This prohibited investment list is updated by the Adviser quarterly and compared against current Fund holdings to confirm that the Fund does not hold any prohibited investments. If during a quarterly review, a security held in the Fund is identified as being on the prohibited investments list, the Fund will divest, as further discussed below.
Because the Fund uses its best efforts to avoid investments in companies that do not pass the values-based screening criteria, it will divest itself, in a timely manner, of any securities of companies held in the Fund’s portfolio that are later determined not to pass the values-based screening criteria, although the sale may be delayed if such securities are illiquid or if Crossmark determines that an immediate sale would have a negative tax or other effect on the Fund. However, the Fund may invest up to 5% of its total assets in certain collective investment vehicles or derivatives that may hold or derive value from securities issued by otherwise excluded companies.
For purposes of the alcohol, tobacco and gambling screens, material involvement means a company that derives 10% or more of its revenues from any combination of these three categories of screened activities. For purposes of the adult entertainment screen, companies directly involved in the production of adult entertainment (defined as media and materials intended to appeal exclusively to the prurient interest) and companies that derive 2% or more of their revenues from the distribution or retail of adult entertainment are screened. For purposes of the abortion, abortion facilities, stem cell research and cannabis screens, there is no revenue threshold; any direct involvement in the screened activities will cause a company to be screened out of the investment universe. For purposes of the abortion facilities screen, health care real estate investment trusts are categorically screened out of the investment universe. For purposes of the abortion and abortion facilities screens, a company that is not itself directly involved in the screened activities will be screened out of the investment universe
if (a) it owns 20% or more of another company that is directly participating in the screened activities, or (b) it is 50% or more owned by another company that is directly participating in the screened activities.
SCECX - Performance
Return Ranking - Trailing
| Period | SCECX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | 13.2% | -3.4% | 36.4% | 66.46% |
| 1 Yr | 27.4% | -2.2% | 70.4% | 69.12% |
| 3 Yr | 14.2%* | 0.0% | 27.0% | 69.12% |
| 5 Yr | 6.7%* | -5.7% | 28.4% | 45.32% |
| 10 Yr | N/A* | 2.2% | 15.5% | 35.45% |
* Annualized
Return Ranking - Calendar
| Period | SCECX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.5% | -59.8% | 21.0% | 68.78% |
| 2024 | 4.0% | -45.8% | 22.7% | 57.55% |
| 2023 | 11.1% | -19.9% | 29.0% | 69.20% |
| 2022 | -33.3% | -59.3% | 118.2% | 94.63% |
| 2021 | 10.6% | -27.4% | 39.3% | 49.16% |
Total Return Ranking - Trailing
| Period | SCECX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | 13.2% | -3.4% | 36.4% | 66.46% |
| 1 Yr | 27.4% | -2.2% | 70.4% | 69.12% |
| 3 Yr | 14.2%* | 0.0% | 27.0% | 69.12% |
| 5 Yr | 6.7%* | -5.7% | 28.4% | 45.32% |
| 10 Yr | N/A* | 2.2% | 15.5% | 34.29% |
* Annualized
Total Return Ranking - Calendar
| Period | SCECX Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5.9% | -7.3% | 22.4% | 68.16% |
| 2024 | 10.4% | -14.7% | 32.4% | 59.18% |
| 2023 | 16.0% | -7.1% | 31.8% | 58.52% |
| 2022 | -14.6% | -45.2% | 123.7% | 24.38% |
| 2021 | 26.5% | 0.0% | 45.6% | 28.87% |
NAV & Total Return History
SCECX - Holdings
Concentration Analysis
| SCECX | Category Low | Category High | SCECX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | 189 M | 825 K | 177 B | 75.31% |
| Number of Holdings | 857 | 2 | 2429 | 14.49% |
| Net Assets in Top 10 | 10.5 M | 164 K | 14 B | 94.08% |
| Weighting of Top 10 | 5.82% | 3.9% | 110.2% | 95.29% |
Top 10 Holdings
- Ciena Corporation COM STK USD0.01 0.76%
- Coherent Corp COM 0.68%
- US Foods Holding Corp COM USD0.01 0.67%
- Royal Gold, Inc. COM USD0.01 0.59%
- Lumentum Holdings Inc. COM USD0.001 0.57%
- RB Global Inc COM 0.56%
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. COM USD1 0.54%
- Pure Storage Inc COM USD0.0001 CL A 0.50%
- United Therapeutics Corporation COM USD0.01 0.49%
- NVent Electric PLC COM USD0.01 0.48%
Asset Allocation
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | SCECX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stocks | 99.64% | 4.13% | 107.43% | 14.29% |
| Cash | 0.44% | 0.00% | 41.75% | 84.90% |
| Other | 0.00% | -0.09% | 55.42% | 34.29% |
| Preferred Stocks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 82.86% |
| Convertible Bonds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.17% | 82.82% |
| Bonds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 148.81% | 83.88% |
Stock Sector Breakdown
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | SCECX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.57% | 8.23% | 37.42% | 38.43% |
| Financial Services | 15.41% | 0.00% | 34.45% | 49.59% |
| Technology | 14.24% | 0.00% | 43.95% | 45.45% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 13.17% | 0.99% | 47.79% | 19.83% |
| Healthcare | 9.88% | 0.00% | 26.53% | 77.89% |
| Real Estate | 9.35% | 0.00% | 29.43% | 22.73% |
| Basic Materials | 6.03% | 0.00% | 16.91% | 22.11% |
| Energy | 5.45% | 0.00% | 37.72% | 64.67% |
| Consumer Defense | 3.85% | 0.00% | 18.87% | 63.02% |
| Utilities | 3.04% | 0.00% | 18.58% | 33.88% |
| Communication Services | 1.99% | 0.00% | 14.85% | 72.73% |
Stock Geographic Breakdown
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | SCECX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | 99.64% | 0.00% | 107.43% | 13.06% |
| Non US | 0.00% | 0.00% | 98.75% | 84.69% |
SCECX - Expenses
Operational Fees
| SCECX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.02% | 18.26% | 79.47% |
| Management Fee | 0.22% | 0.00% | 1.25% | 13.93% |
| 12b-1 Fee | N/A | 0.00% | 1.00% | N/A |
| Administrative Fee | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 39.24% |
Sales Fees
| SCECX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Load | N/A | 3.50% | 5.75% | N/A |
| Deferred Load | N/A | 1.00% | 5.00% | N/A |
Trading Fees
| SCECX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Redemption Fee | N/A | 1.00% | 2.00% | N/A |
Related Fees
Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.
| SCECX Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover | N/A | 1.00% | 314.00% | 25.00% |
SCECX - Distributions
Dividend Yield Analysis
| SCECX | Category Low | Category High | SCECX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 0.00% | 42.47% | 11.02% |
Dividend Distribution Analysis
| SCECX | Category Low | Category High | Category Mod | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Distribution Frequency | Annual | Annually | Quarterly | Annual |
Net Income Ratio Analysis
| SCECX | Category Low | Category High | SCECX % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Income Ratio | 0.51% | -2.40% | 2.49% | 29.75% |
Capital Gain Distribution Analysis
| SCECX | Category Low | Category High | Capital Mode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Gain Distribution Frequency | Annually | Annually | Semi-Annually | Annually |
Distributions History
| Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | $0.104 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 18, 2025 | $0.107 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 18, 2025 | $0.872 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $0.796 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $0.125 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $0.127 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 19, 2024 | $0.544 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 21, 2023 | $0.122 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2023 | $0.018 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 21, 2023 | $0.406 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 16, 2022 | $0.112 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 16, 2022 | $0.327 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 16, 2022 | $2.676 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Dec 17, 2021 | $2.282 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 11, 2021 | $0.013 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 12, 2021 | $0.008 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 18, 2020 | $0.543 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 11, 2020 | $0.024 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 12, 2020 | $0.011 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 13, 2020 | $0.070 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 20, 2019 | $0.033 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 20, 2019 | $0.456 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Sep 13, 2019 | $0.033 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 15, 2019 | $0.002 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2018 | $0.069 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 21, 2018 | $0.123 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 21, 2018 | $1.657 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Sep 14, 2018 | $0.037 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 15, 2018 | $0.025 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 16, 2018 | $0.013 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 15, 2017 | $0.061 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 15, 2017 | $0.210 | CapitalGainShortTerm |
| Dec 15, 2017 | $0.930 | CapitalGainLongTerm |
| Sep 15, 2017 | $0.028 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 16, 2017 | $0.021 | OrdinaryDividend |
SCECX - Fund Manager Analysis
Managers
Brent Lium
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Dec 20, 2019
2.45
2.5%
Brent Lium joined Crossmark in November of 2019 as Managing Director with over 24 years of industry experience. His primary role is co-managing the Steward Enhanced Index Funds and the Large Cap Core Growth product. Brent started his investment career in 1995 with Dean Witter in Dallas. Following business school in 2001, he joined Invesco Ltd as an equity analyst on a growth mutual fund team. There he developed his extensive bottoms-up fundamental equity research abilities. He rounded out his top down strategy skills after being promoted to portfolio manager a few years later. Brent earned a BBA in Accounting from Texas A&M University and an MBA in Finance from the University of Texas - Austin. He is also a CFA Charterholder. He lives in West University Place, TX with his wife Carrie and three children. When he is not at one of his kid’s sporting events or activities, he loves to travel and do any outdoor activity.
Ryan Caylor
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Mar 23, 2020
2.19
2.2%
Ryan joined Crossmark in June of 2016 and currently serves as a Portfolio Manager & Head of Research. He is responsible for generating independent and differentiated fundamental research on markets, sectors, and individual companies in support of Crossmark's Portfolio Managers and Investment Teams. Prior to joining Capstone, Ryan was a sell-side Equity Research Associate at Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH) covering competitive power and electric utility stocks. Prior to TPH, Ryan was an Associate in the Energy Valuation Group at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ryan graduated from Tulane University in New Orleans with an undergraduate degree in Finance, as well as Masters degrees in Accounting and Finance. He currently holds his Series 7, 63, 86, and 87 securities licenses.
Tenure Analysis
| Category Low | Category High | Category Average | Category Mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.08 | 49.61 | 7.09 | 0.54 |