Continue to site >
Trending ETFs

Name

As of 06/01/2026

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

$37.24

$2.19 B

0.72%

$0.27

0.22%

Vitals

YTD Return

13.0%

1 yr return

31.3%

3 Yr Avg Return

22.3%

5 Yr Avg Return

12.6%

Net Assets

$2.19 B

Holdings in Top 10

31.6%

52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH

$37.1
N/A
N/A

Expenses

OPERATING FEES

Expense Ratio 0.22%

SALES FEES

Front Load N/A

Deferred Load N/A

TRADING FEES

Turnover 16.00%

Redemption Fee N/A


Min Investment

Standard (Taxable)

$0

IRA

N/A


Fund Classification

Fund Type

Open End Mutual Fund


Name

As of 06/01/2026

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

$37.24

$2.19 B

0.72%

$0.27

0.22%

DFUEX - Profile

Distributions

  • YTD Total Return 13.0%
  • 3 Yr Annualized Total Return 22.3%
  • 5 Yr Annualized Total Return 12.6%
  • Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually
  • Net Income Ratio 1.20%
DIVIDENDS
  • Dividend Yield 0.7%
  • Dividend Distribution Frequency Quarterly

Fund Details

  • Legal Name
    U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio
  • Fund Family Name
    Dimensional Funds
  • Inception Date
    Nov 19, 2007
  • Shares Outstanding
    N/A
  • Share Class
    Other
  • Currency
    USD
  • Domiciled Country
    US
  • Manager
    Jed Fogdall

Fund Description

To achieve the U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio’s investment objective, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (the “Advisor”) implements an integrated investment approach that combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading functions. As further described below, the Portfolio’s design emphasizes long-term drivers of expected returns identified by the Advisor’s research, while balancing risk through broad diversification across companies and sectors. The Advisor’s portfolio management and trading processes further balance those long-term drivers of expected returns with shorter-term drivers of expected returns and trading costs.

The U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio is designed to purchase a broad and diverse group of equity securities within a market capitalization weighted universe (e.g., the larger the company, the greater the proportion of the universe it

represents) of U.S. operating companies (the “U.S. Universe”). The Portfolio invests in companies of all sizes, with meaningfully increased exposure to smaller capitalization, lower relative price, and higher profitability companies as compared to their representation in the U.S. Universe, while excluding companies based on the Portfolio’s social issue screens. The Portfolio’s meaningfully increased exposure to smaller capitalization, lower relative price, and higher profitability companies may be achieved by decreasing the allocation of the Portfolio’s assets to larger capitalization, higher relative price, or lower profitability companies relative to their weight in the U.S. Universe. An equity issuer is considered to have a high relative price (i.e., a growth stock) primarily because it has a high price in relation to its book value. An equity issuer is considered to have a low relative price (i.e., a value stock) primarily because it has a low price in relation to its book value. In assessing relative price, the Advisor may consider additional factors such as price to cash flow or price to earnings ratios. An equity issuer is considered to have high profitability because it has high earnings or profits from operations in relation to its book value or assets. The criteria the Advisor uses for assessing relative price and profitability are subject to change from time to time.Additionally, the representation of securities in the Portfolio as compared to their representation in the U.S. Universe may be affected by the Portfolio’s social issue screens.

As a non-fundamental policy, under normal circumstances, the U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio will invest at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. companies. The Advisor generally defines a U.S. company as one that is listed and principally traded on a securities exchange in the United States that is deemed appropriate by the Advisor.

The Advisor may also increase or reduce the U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio’s exposure to an eligible company, or exclude a company, based on shorter-term considerations, such as a company’s price momentum, short-run reversals, and investment characteristics. In assessing a company’s investment characteristics, the Advisor considers ratios such as recent changes in assets divided by total assets. The criteria the Advisor uses for assessing a company’s investment characteristics are subject to change from time to time. In addition, the Advisor seeks to reduce trading costs using a flexible trading approach that looks for opportunities to participate in the available market liquidity, while managing turnover and explicit transaction costs.

The U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio also may purchase or sell futures contracts and options on futures contracts for U.S. equity securities and indices, to increase or decrease equity market exposure based on actual or expected cash inflows to or outflows from the Portfolio. The above-referenced investments are not subject to, although they may incorporate, the Portfolio’s social criteria.

The U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio may lend its portfolio securities to generate additional income.

The U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio seeks to purchase securities that are consistent with the Portfolio’s social issue screens, which are monitored by, or based upon information from, an independent third party. The Portfolio seeks to exclude from its investment portfolio those companies that are identified by the Portfolio’s social issue screens, as further discussed below. The Portfolio’s social issue screens are designed to identify companies that: (1) earn at least 10% of their total annual revenue through the production and/or sale of conventional or nuclear weapons, their weapon systems, or key intended components of these products, or the provision of weapon systems support and service related to nuclear weapons, such as the repair and maintenance of nuclear weapons; (2) have demonstrated complicity in genocide in Sudan, for example, by having ties to the Sudanese military or government, selling or distributing military equipment to a party based in Sudan or operating within Sudan borders, or generating 10% or more of its total assets or revenues in Sudan from the oil, mineral or power sectors; (3) earn at least 10% of their total annual revenue through the production and/or sale of tobacco (this criteria does not cover products designed as an aid to quit smoking), alcoholic beverages as an intoxicating agent this criteria does not cover packaging such as bottles, cans, corks or caps), or cannabis products; (4) earn at least 10% of their total annual revenue from the ownership or operation of gambling facilities, licensing their brand name to gambling products, or providing support or services to the gambling industry; (5) directly participate in abortions, or develop or manufacture abortive agents or contraceptives; (6) earn at least 10% of their total annual revenue from the retail, distribution or production of pornographic products (this criteria does not cover companies that offer content sharing platforms that are not pornography focused but allow third-party users to upload pornographic content; (7) are involved in the production of landmines, cluster munitions, or key intended components of such weapons; (8) produce firearms (i.e., using an explosive charge as a propellant) intended for civilian use; (9) have had involvement in severe child labor controversies (factors that may be considered for determining severity include, but are not limited to, a history of involvement in child labor-related legal cases, widespread or egregious instances of child labor, resistance to improved practices, and criticism by non-governmental organizations and/or other third-party

observers); (10) conduct stem cell research using cells derived from human embryos or fetal tissue, or use fetal cell lines in the development of vaccines or other biopharmaceuticals; (11) operate or manage, or provide staffing services to, for-profit correctional and/or detention facilities (this criteria does not cover provision of maintenance or non-management services, including staffing for such services); (12) have material involvement in severe environmental, social or governance controversies that indicate operations inconsistent with responsible business conduct standards, such as those defined by the United Nations Global Compact Principles and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises; (13) have relatively high carbon intensity or potential emissions from reserves or scaled potential emissions from reserves; and/or (14) have thermal or metallurgical coal reserves.

The U.S. Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio may modify this list of social issue screens, at any time, without prior shareholder approval or notice. (See “Additional Information on Investment Objectives and Policies—Applying the Portfolios’ Social Criteria” in this Prospectus.)

Read More

DFUEX - Performance

Return Ranking - Trailing

Period DFUEX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 13.0% -13.2% 43.7% 9.78%
1 Yr 31.3% -15.7% 101.9% 12.33%
3 Yr 22.3%* 1.1% 41.0% 14.20%
5 Yr 12.6%* -3.9% 19.6% 45.10%
10 Yr 14.4%* 5.8% 55.9% 42.37%

* Annualized

Return Ranking - Calendar

Period DFUEX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2025 14.9% -25.2% 36.9% 17.71%
2024 21.9% -51.6% 37.0% 17.36%
2023 22.5% -15.6% 47.4% 31.27%
2022 -21.5% -56.3% 1.1% 53.07%
2021 21.9% -27.2% 537.8% 27.08%

Total Return Ranking - Trailing

Period DFUEX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 13.0% -13.2% 43.7% 9.78%
1 Yr 31.3% -15.7% 101.9% 12.33%
3 Yr 22.3%* 1.1% 41.0% 14.20%
5 Yr 12.6%* -3.9% 19.6% 45.10%
10 Yr 14.4%* 5.8% 55.9% 42.37%

* Annualized

Total Return Ranking - Calendar

Period DFUEX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2025 16.0% -3.4% 43.4% 56.56%
2024 23.1% -20.1% 44.5% 48.72%
2023 24.9% 0.3% 47.4% 47.88%
2022 -18.0% -31.9% 11.0% 47.73%
2021 27.9% 4.1% 537.8% 35.87%

NAV & Total Return History


DFUEX - Holdings

Concentration Analysis

DFUEX Category Low Category High DFUEX % Rank
Net Assets 2.19 B 3.76 M 2.2 T 47.93%
Number of Holdings 2148 2 3885 2.82%
Net Assets in Top 10 690 M 3.24 M 639 B 49.69%
Weighting of Top 10 31.56% 2.5% 102.7% 84.69%

Top 10 Holdings

  1. NVIDIA Corp. 7.42%
  2. Microsoft Corp. 5.60%
  3. Apple, Inc. 5.55%
  4. Amazon.com, Inc. 3.25%
  5. Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.68%
  6. Alphabet, Inc. 1.67%
  7. DFA Investment Trust Co. 1.41%
  8. JPMorgan Chase Co. 1.37%
  9. DFA Short Term Investment Fund 1.34%
  10. Alphabet, Inc. 1.27%

Asset Allocation

Weighting Return Low Return High DFUEX % Rank
Stocks
101.13% 0.00% 105.13% 0.44%
Cash
1.60% 0.00% 69.97% 29.96%
Other
0.00% -13.91% 100.00% 28.63%
Preferred Stocks
0.00% 0.00% 5.74% 54.63%
Convertible Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 5.54% 51.81%
Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 136.21% 53.74%

Stock Sector Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High DFUEX % Rank
Technology
24.11% 0.00% 48.94% 53.55%
Financial Services
17.76% 0.00% 55.59% 12.76%
Industrials
14.20% 0.00% 29.90% 9.43%
Consumer Cyclical
13.34% 0.00% 30.33% 8.36%
Communication Services
8.05% 0.00% 27.94% 57.95%
Consumer Defense
7.14% 0.00% 47.71% 38.81%
Healthcare
6.70% 0.00% 52.29% 97.57%
Basic Materials
4.47% 0.00% 19.45% 14.20%
Energy
2.79% 0.00% 41.64% 73.32%
Utilities
0.99% 0.00% 15.25% 76.82%
Real Estate
0.46% 0.00% 31.91% 83.56%

Stock Geographic Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High DFUEX % Rank
US
101.13% 0.00% 101.31% 0.18%
Non US
0.00% 0.00% 70.69% 60.70%

DFUEX - Expenses

Operational Fees

DFUEX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Expense Ratio 0.22% 0.01% 4.93% 86.25%
Management Fee 0.18% 0.00% 1.89% 19.47%
12b-1 Fee N/A 0.00% 1.00% N/A
Administrative Fee N/A 0.00% 0.85% 1.22%

Sales Fees

DFUEX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Front Load N/A 1.00% 5.75% N/A
Deferred Load N/A 1.00% 4.00% N/A

Trading Fees

DFUEX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Max Redemption Fee N/A 0.25% 2.00% N/A

Related Fees

Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.

DFUEX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Turnover 16.00% 0.00% 268.00% 36.59%

DFUEX - Distributions

Dividend Yield Analysis

DFUEX Category Low Category High DFUEX % Rank
Dividend Yield 0.72% 0.00% 25.47% 40.70%

Dividend Distribution Analysis

DFUEX Category Low Category High Category Mod
Dividend Distribution Frequency Quarterly Annual Quarterly Quarterly

Net Income Ratio Analysis

DFUEX Category Low Category High DFUEX % Rank
Net Income Ratio 1.20% -54.00% 2.44% 21.24%

Capital Gain Distribution Analysis

DFUEX Category Low Category High Capital Mode
Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually Annually Semi-Annually Annually

Distributions History

View More +

DFUEX - Fund Manager Analysis

Managers

Jed Fogdall


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Feb 28, 2012

10.26

10.3%

Jed S. Fogdall is a Co-Head of Portfolio Management and Vice President of Dimensional and a member of Dimensional’s Investment Committee. Mr. Fogdall has an MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles and a BS from Purdue University. Mr. Fogdall joined Dimensional as a Portfolio Manager in 2004 and has been responsible for international portfolios since 2010 and domestic portfolios since 2012.

John Hertzer


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Feb 28, 2022

0.25

0.3%

Mr. Hertzer joined DFA in 2013. Mr. Hertzer began his investment career in 2004 and earned a B.A. from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the University of California Los Angeles.

Mary Phillips


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Feb 28, 2022

0.25

0.3%

Mary T. Phillips, CFA, Deputy Head of Portfolio Management, North America, Senior Portfolio Manager and Vice President of Dimensional, joined Dimensional in 2012 and has been a portfolio manager since 2014. Ms. Phillips began managing Dimensional’s allocated portion of the Fund’s portfolio in March 2018. Ms. Phillips earned an MBA with concentration in analytic finance, statistics and econometrics, and managerial and organizational behavior from the University of Chicago and a BA from the University of Puget Sound.

Tenure Analysis

Category Low Category High Category Average Category Mode
0.04 39.02 7.35 2.25