State Street® SPDR® MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
ETF
NZUS
Price as of:
$37.88
- $0.00
- 0.00%
Primary Theme
N/A
fund company
N/A
Name
As of 05/14/2026Price
Aum/Mkt Cap
YIELD
Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.
Exp Ratio
Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.
Watchlist
Vitals
YTD Return
5.5%
1 yr return
21.3%
3 Yr Avg Return
20.7%
5 Yr Avg Return
N/A
Net Assets
$2.94 M
Holdings in Top 10
47.0%
52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH
$37.9
$31.55
$38.04
Expenses
OPERATING FEES
Expense Ratio 0.10%
SALES FEES
Front Load N/A
Deferred Load N/A
TRADING FEES
Turnover N/A
Redemption Fee N/A
Min Investment
Standard (Taxable)
N/A
IRA
N/A
Fund Classification
Fund Type
Exchange Traded Fund
Name
As of 05/14/2026Price
Aum/Mkt Cap
YIELD
Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.
Exp Ratio
Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.
Watchlist
NZUS - Profile
Distributions
- YTD Total Return 5.5%
- 3 Yr Annualized Total Return 20.7%
- 5 Yr Annualized Total Return N/A
- Capital Gain Distribution Frequency N/A
- Net Income Ratio N/A
- Dividend Yield 0.6%
- Dividend Distribution Frequency None
Fund Details
-
Legal NameState Street® SPDR® MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
-
Fund Family NameState Street Investment Management Funds
-
Inception DateApr 22, 2022
-
Shares OutstandingN/A
-
Share ClassN/A
-
CurrencyUSD
-
Domiciled CountryUS
-
ManagerKarl Schneider
Fund Description
In seeking to track the performance of the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index (the “Index”), the Fund employs a sampling strategy, which means that the Fund is not required to purchase all of the securities represented in the Index. Instead, the Fund may purchase a subset of the securities in the Index in an effort to hold a portfolio of securities with generally the same risk and return characteristics of the Index. The quantity of holdings in the Fund will be based on a number of factors, including asset size of the Fund. Based on its analysis of these factors, SSGA Funds Management, Inc. (“SSGA FM” or the “Adviser”), the investment adviser to the Fund, either may invest the Fund's assets in a subset of securities in the Index or may invest the Fund's assets in substantially all of the securities represented in the Index in approximately the same proportions as the Index, as determined by the Adviser to be in the best interest of the Fund in pursuing its objective.Under normal market conditions, the Fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the Index. In addition, in seeking to track the Index, the Fund may invest in equity securities that are not included in the Index. The Fund may also invest in cash and cash equivalents or money market instruments (including money market funds advised by the Adviser) for cash management purposes. In seeking to track the Index, the Fund's assets may be concentrated in an industry or group of industries, but only to the extent that the Index concentrates in a particular industry or group of industries. Futures contracts (a type of derivative instrument) may be used by the Fund in seeking performance that corresponds to the Index and in managing cash flows.The Index is designed to exceed the minimum standards for a “Paris-Aligned Benchmark” under the EU BMR. A Paris-Aligned Benchmark is designed to align with a principal objective of the Paris Agreement (a binding international treaty agreement on climate change) to limit the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius (preferably 1.5 degrees Celsius) above pre-industrial levels. The initial universe from which the Index selects constituents is the MSCI USA Index (the “Parent Index”), which measures the performance of the large- and mid-capitalization segments of the U.S. equity market. To construct the universe of constituents eligible for inclusion in the Index (the “Eligible Universe”), the Parent Index is first screened to remove securities of issuers based on any of the following exclusionary criteria: •All companies producing cluster bombs, landmines, depleted uranium, chemical or biological weapons, blinding laser weapons, non-detectable fragments or incendiary weapons; producing key components of cluster bombs, landmines, depleted uranium weapons, or chemical or biological weapons; owning 20% or more (50% for financial companies) of a weapons or components producer; or that are 50% or more owned by a company involved in weapons or components production.•All companies assigned an MSCI ESG (environmental, social or governance) Controversy Score of 0 or that are not assigned an MSCI ESG Controversy Score.•All companies that produce tobacco or derive 5% or more aggregate revenue from the production, distribution, retail and supply of tobacco-related products.•All companies assigned an MSCI Environmental Controversy Score of 0 or 1.•All companies deriving 1% or more revenue from mining of thermal coal and its sale to external parties (excluding all revenue from metallurgical coal, coal mined for internal power generation, intracompany sales of mined thermal coal, and coal trading).•All companies involved in thermal coal distribution or transport, including the transport of thermal coal by road, rail, shipping or air, and the physical trading of thermal coal. This screen does not include involvement in the storage of thermal coal and involvement in metallurgical coal-related activities.•All companies deriving 10% or more revenue from oil and gas related activities, including distribution/retail, equipment and services, extraction and production, petrochemicals, pipelines and transportation and refining (excluding biofuel production and sales and trading activities).•All companies deriving 50% or more revenue from thermal coal based, liquid fuel based and natural gas based power generation.•All companies that produce firearms and small arms ammunitions for civilian markets (excluding companies that cater to military, government and law enforcement markets) or derive 5% or more revenue from the production and distribution of firearms or small arms ammunition intended for civilian use.•All companies that (i) manufacture nuclear warheads and/or whole nuclear missiles; (ii) manufacture components that were developed or are significantly modified for exclusive use in nuclear warheads and/or nuclear missiles; (iii) manufacture or assemble delivery platforms that were developed or significantly modified for the exclusive delivery of nuclear weapons; (iv) provide auxiliary services related to nuclear weapons; (v) manufacture components that were not developed or not significantly modified for exclusive use in nuclear warheads and/or nuclear missiles but can be used in nuclear weapons; (vi) manufacture or assemble delivery platforms that were not developed or not significantly modified for the exclusive delivery of nuclear weapons but have the capability to deliver nuclear weapons; and (vii) manufacture components for nuclear-exclusive delivery platforms.The Index Provider incorporates data drawn from a number of sources for applying the exclusionary screens. Companies not assessed by the Index Provider on data for MSCI ESG Controversies, climate change metrics or business involvement screening are not eligible for inclusion in the Index. An MSCI ESG Controversy Score provides an assessment of controversies concerning any negative environmental, social, and/or governance impact of a company's operations, products, and services. To evaluate ESG controversies, the Index Provider monitors across five categories of ESG impact – environment, human rights and communities, labor rights and supply chain, customers and governance – and 28 sub-categories. MSCI ESG Controversy Scores fall on a 0-10 scale, with 0 representing a company assessed as having involvement in very severe controversies. An MSCI Environmental Controversy Score provides an assessment of controversies related to a company's impact on the environment. Environmental controversies can relate to, among other things, toxic emissions and waste, operational waste (non-hazardous), energy and climate change, water stress, biodiversity and land use, and supply chain management. MSCI Environmental Controversy Scores fall on a 0-10 scale, with 0 and 1 representing a company having faced very severe and severe controversies pertaining to environmental issues, respectively.The final portfolio of securities is constructed using an optimization process that seeks to select and weight securities from the Eligible Universe based on constraints designed to (i) minimize the Index's exposure to physical and transition risks of climate change (“transition and physical risk objectives”) and (ii) target exposure to sustainable investment opportunities (“transition opportunities objectives”). In addition, the optimization process also incorporates target constraints to seek to minimize the risk of significant differences in constituent or sector weightings relative to the Parent Index, while aiming to control for constituent turnover and minimize tracking error relative to the Parent Index (“target diversification constraints”).The optimization process incorporates the following Index-level constraints to achieve transition and physical risk objectives:•At least 50% reduction in the weighted average of index constituents' greenhouse gas (“GHG”) Intensity relative to the Parent Index, taking into account Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. Scope 1 emissions are direct GHG emissions that occur from sources that are controlled or owned by an organization. Scope 2 emissions are indirect GHG emissions generated in the production of electricity consumed by the organization. Scope 3 emissions encompass all other indirect GHG emissions that are a consequence of the activities of the organization, but occur from sources not owned or controlled by the organization. GHG Intensity measures a company's Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions relative to its enterprise value including cash. MSCI ESG Research uses a proprietary estimation model to calculate all Scope 3 emissions, and Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for companies who do not report GHG emissions.•At least 10% average reduction (per year) in GHG Intensity relative to GHG Intensity of the Index as of June 1, 2020.•Aggregate exposure to High Climate Impact Sectors that is not less than the aggregate exposure in the Parent Index. High Impact Climate Sectors are defined by EU BMR as those sectors that are key to the low-carbon transition.•At least 20% increase, relative to the Eligible Universe, in the aggregate weight of companies (i) having one or more active carbon emissions reduction target(s) approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), or (ii) companies that (a) publish emissions reduction targets, (b) publish their annual emissions levels, and (c) have reduced their GHG intensity by at least 7% over each of the last three years.•At least 50% reduction in the weighted average of index constituents' Potential Emissions Intensity relative to the Parent Index. Potential Emissions Intensity represents the sum of a company's estimated carbon emissions assuming the company uses its owned coal, oil and gas reserves relative to the company's enterprise value including cash.•Aggregate Climate Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) greater than or equal to -5% of the aggregate Climate VaR of the Parent Index. Climate VaR is designed to provide a forward looking assessment of the impacts of climate change on a company's valuation based on various global average temperature warming scenarios.•At least 5% increase in the weighted average of index constituents' Low Carbon Transition (LCT) Score relative to the Parent Index. The LCT Score seeks to identify a company's exposure to and management of risk and opportunities related to low carbon transition.•At least 50% reduction in the weighted average of index constituents' Physical Risk Climate VaR (Aggressive Scenario) relative to the Parent Index. Physical Climate VaR ( Aggressive Scenario) is an assessment of a company's “worst-case” (95th percentile) future costs arising from extreme weather events and the potential impact of such costs on the company's future financial performance, assuming emissions and temperatures rise steadily, reaching approximately 4°C of global warming in 2100.The optimization process incorporates the following Index-level constraints to achieve transition opportunities objectives:•At least 5% increase in weighted average of index constituents' LCT Score relative to Parent Index.•At least 400% increase in the ratio of Weighted Average Green Revenue/Weighted Average Fossil Fuel-based Revenue relative to the Parent Index. Weighted Average Green Revenue represents the weighted average of index constituents' percentage of revenue derived from alternative energy, energy efficiency, sustainable water, green building, pollution prevention, and sustainable agriculture. Weighted Average Fossil Fuel-based Revenue represents the weighted average of index constituents' percentage of revenue derived from the mining of thermal coal (excluding metallurgical coal, coal mined for internal power generation, intra-company sales of mined thermal coal and revenue from coal trading) or its sale to external parties, extraction, production and refining of conventional and unconventional oil and gas, and power generation based on thermal coal, liquid fuel, and natural gas.•At least 100% increase in Weighted Average Green Revenue relative to the Parent Index.•An Index Implied Temperature Rise of 2 degrees Celsius or below. The Index Provider's Implied Temperature Rise model estimates the Index constituents' alignment to a specific global temperature rise scenario based on projected forward-looking emissions. Companies that do not have data available to calculate Implied Temperature Rise are still eligible for Index inclusion but are not considered for the Index Implied Temperature Rise calculation.•Aggregate Cumulative Projected Emissions aligned with an Implied Temperature Rise of 1.5 degrees or below. Cumulative Projected Emissions is an estimation of a company's total carbon emissions until 2050, based on decarbonization assumptions. Companies that do not have data available to calculate Cumulative Projected Emissions are still eligible for Index inclusion but are not considered in the Index-level aggregation.The Index's optimization process incorporates information and data from internal and external (e.g., issuers, government agencies and non-profit organizations) sources, including research, reports, publications or public records.The Index is rebalanced and reconstituted on a semi-annual basis, as of the close of the last business day of May and November. The optimization process described above is applied in connection with the semi-annual Index review. During the semi-annual Index review, in the event the Index-level constraints are not met through the optimization process, certain target diversification constraints will be relaxed until the Index-level constraints are achieved. As of August 31, 2025, a significant portion of the Fund comprised companies in the technology and financial sectors, although this may change from time to time. As of July 31, 2025, the Index comprised 181 stocks.The Index is sponsored by MSCI, Inc. (the “Index Provider”), which is not affiliated with the Fund or the Adviser. The Index Provider determines the composition of the Index, relative weightings of the securities in the Index and publishes information regarding the market value of the Index.
Read More
NZUS - Performance
Return Ranking - Trailing
| Period | NZUS Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | 5.5% | -51.8% | 22.1% | N/A |
| 1 Yr | 21.3% | -58.9% | 46.9% | N/A |
| 3 Yr | 20.7%* | -25.7% | 197.6% | N/A |
| 5 Yr | N/A* | -29.1% | 93.8% | N/A |
| 10 Yr | N/A* | -17.2% | 37.0% | N/A |
* Annualized
Return Ranking - Calendar
| Period | NZUS Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12.9% | -69.4% | 53.7% | N/A |
| 2024 | 17.9% | -94.0% | 152.6% | N/A |
| 2023 | 27.7% | -13.9% | 183.6% | N/A |
| 2022 | N/A | -18.2% | 8.9% | N/A |
| 2021 | N/A | -80.2% | 35.2% | N/A |
Total Return Ranking - Trailing
| Period | NZUS Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | 5.5% | -97.2% | 22.1% | N/A |
| 1 Yr | 21.3% | -58.9% | 67.6% | N/A |
| 3 Yr | 20.7%* | -25.7% | 197.6% | N/A |
| 5 Yr | N/A* | -28.1% | 93.8% | N/A |
| 10 Yr | N/A* | -11.8% | 37.0% | N/A |
* Annualized
Total Return Ranking - Calendar
| Period | NZUS Return | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14.0% | -69.4% | 53.7% | N/A |
| 2024 | 24.3% | -94.0% | 152.6% | N/A |
| 2023 | 29.1% | -13.9% | 183.6% | N/A |
| 2022 | N/A | -12.8% | 8.9% | N/A |
| 2021 | N/A | -60.0% | 35.2% | N/A |
NZUS - Holdings
Concentration Analysis
| NZUS | Category Low | Category High | NZUS % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | 2.94 M | 177 K | 1.21 T | 78.40% |
| Number of Holdings | 150 | 2 | 4154 | 26.56% |
| Net Assets in Top 10 | 1.35 M | 1.74 K | 270 B | 79.11% |
| Weighting of Top 10 | 46.97% | 1.8% | 100.0% | 58.33% |
Top 10 Holdings
- NVIDIA Corp 9.59%
- Microsoft Corp 7.67%
- Apple Inc 7.31%
- Tesla Inc 4.25%
- Alphabet Inc 3.67%
- Eli Lilly Co 3.48%
- Amazon.com Inc 3.44%
- Broadcom Inc 2.61%
- Meta Platforms Inc 2.59%
- Mastercard Inc 2.36%
Asset Allocation
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | NZUS % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stocks | 99.83% | 0.00% | 130.24% | 22.34% |
| Cash | 0.17% | -102.29% | 100.00% | 76.42% |
| Preferred Stocks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 58.99% |
| Other | 0.00% | -13.91% | 134.98% | 59.06% |
| Convertible Bonds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.54% | 56.92% |
| Bonds | 0.00% | -0.04% | 95.81% | 56.85% |
Stock Sector Breakdown
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | NZUS % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.44% | 80.46% |
| Technology | 0.00% | 0.00% | 48.94% | 3.85% |
| Real Estate | 0.00% | 0.00% | 37.52% | 1.40% |
| Industrials | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.90% | 35.92% |
| Healthcare | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.70% | 79.83% |
| Financial Services | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.59% | 46.64% |
| Energy | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.64% | 93.14% |
| Communication Services | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.94% | 70.45% |
| Consumer Defense | 0.00% | 0.00% | 49.14% | 96.01% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 0.00% | 0.00% | 50.47% | 36.06% |
| Basic Materials | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.10% | 75.70% |
Stock Geographic Breakdown
| Weighting | Return Low | Return High | NZUS % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | 99.83% | 0.00% | 127.77% | 15.42% |
| Non US | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.51% | 76.21% |
NZUS - Expenses
Operational Fees
| NZUS Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.01% | 2.95% | 93.97% |
| Management Fee | 0.10% | 0.00% | 2.00% | 10.12% |
| 12b-1 Fee | N/A | 0.00% | 1.00% | N/A |
| Administrative Fee | N/A | 0.00% | 0.85% | N/A |
Sales Fees
| NZUS Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Load | N/A | 0.00% | 5.75% | N/A |
| Deferred Load | N/A | 1.00% | 5.00% | N/A |
Trading Fees
| NZUS Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Redemption Fee | N/A | 0.25% | 2.00% | N/A |
Related Fees
Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.
| NZUS Fees (% of AUM) | Category Return Low | Category Return High | Rank in Category (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover | N/A | 0.00% | 496.00% | N/A |
NZUS - Distributions
Dividend Yield Analysis
| NZUS | Category Low | Category High | NZUS % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 0.00% | 19.15% | 47.13% |
Dividend Distribution Analysis
| NZUS | Category Low | Category High | Category Mod | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Distribution Frequency | None | Annually | Quarterly | Annually |
Net Income Ratio Analysis
| NZUS | Category Low | Category High | NZUS % Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Income Ratio | N/A | -54.00% | 6.06% | N/A |
Capital Gain Distribution Analysis
| NZUS | Category Low | Category High | Capital Mode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Gain Distribution Frequency | Annually | Annually | Annually |
Distributions History
| Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 02, 2026 | $0.055 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Nov 25, 2025 | $0.094 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 02, 2025 | $0.077 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 02, 2025 | $0.097 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 03, 2025 | $0.052 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 02, 2024 | $1.564 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 03, 2024 | $0.083 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 03, 2024 | $0.081 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 01, 2024 | $0.020 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 01, 2023 | $0.137 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 01, 2023 | $0.060 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 01, 2023 | $0.078 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Mar 01, 2023 | $0.015 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Dec 01, 2022 | $0.137 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Sep 01, 2022 | $0.083 | OrdinaryDividend |
| Jun 01, 2022 | $0.040 | OrdinaryDividend |
NZUS - Fund Manager Analysis
Managers
Karl Schneider
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Apr 21, 2022
0.11
0.1%
Karl Schneider, CAIA, is a Vice President of SSGA and SSGA FM, and Head of U.S. Equity Strategies for GEBS, where in addition to overseeing the management of the U.S. equity index strategies, he also serves as a portfolio manager for a number of the group's passive equity portfolios. Previously within GEBS, he served as a portfolio manager and product specialist for synthetic beta strategies, including commodities, buy/write, and hedge fund replication. Prior to joining GEBS, Mr. Schneider worked as a portfolio manager in SSGA's Currency Management Group, managing both active currency selection and traditional passive hedging overlay portfolios. He joined SSGA in 1996. Mr. Schneider holds a BS in finance and investments from Babson College and an MS in finance from Boston College. He has earned the Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst designation. Mr. Schneider is a member of the CAIA Association.
Emiliano Rabinovich
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Apr 21, 2022
0.11
0.1%
Emiliano Rabinovich, CFA, is a Vice President of SSGA and the Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager in the Global Equity Beta Solutions Group. Within this group, he is the strategy leader for their Smart Beta and ESG products. Mr. Rabinovich currently manages a varied mix of funds that include both traditional indexing and a variety of alternative beta mandates. Also, he manages several local and global strategies and fund structures, which include separate accounts, commingled funds and mutual funds.
Lisa Hobart
Start Date
Tenure
Tenure Rank
Apr 21, 2022
0.11
0.1%
Lisa Hobart is a Vice President of SSGA and a Portfolio Manager in the Global Equity Beta Solutions Group. Ms. Hobart is currently responsible for managing various equity index funds, with both domestic and international strategies. Ms. Hobart joined State Street Bank London in 2000 and moved to SSGA as a senior portfolio analyst in 2006. During her career at SSGA, Lisa has managed the Investment Operations team, supporting passive, enhanced and active equity strategies. Ms. Hobart graduated from Leeds University with a Bachelor of Arts (Hons.) in Economics and Management. She holds the Investment Management Certificate.
Tenure Analysis
| Category Low | Category High | Category Average | Category Mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.04 | 39.02 | 7.17 | 2.42 |